Кто владеет информацией,
|3 dec 2016|
Saidov Ruslan 12.05.2006
On the 28th of April on a site "Chechenpress" S.Talkhigov's curious publication appeared, the publication drew my attention as the author because of unknown to me reason mentioned rather slippery and extremely disadvantageous for him theme. He made it in the way as though he had decided meaningly to provoke my response. Well, reaction followed in no time.
So, in Talkhigovs article is said about the event which occurred (or may be didnt) at the end of June (according to other later "specified" data of "investigators" - on the 4th of July), 1999 - about the meeting which ostensibly took place in the French Nice between Shamil Basayev and one of confidants of the president of Russia Yeltsin.
Talkhilov is proving to the western and Russian public that such meeting hasnt taken place mentioning as a reason the fact that on the 3rd of July, 1999 Basayev was present on public action in Groznyy and before it "was engaged in public works in the Chechen capital and its areas", besides he could not "go into a huddle with despicable enemy" at all.
At the same time Talkhigov informed us about other meeting which took place in French Biarritz at the moment - between an oligarch Boris Berezovsky and director of FSB Vladimir Putin. According to Talkhigov, in the spring of 1999 Putin already knew about preparations for the input of federal armies to the
However, in the description Talkhigov for some reason places
At last, in his narration Talkhilov mentioned me and the whole group of other people in a context of our possible belonging to the Russian special services and illegal activity. It is necessary to note that "Chechenpress" does it not for the first time. Its editors are not confused that similar charges have been repeatedly denied in mass-media, that no one of the law enforcement bodies in the world have or had claims to the people listed by Talkhigov, that the American site controlled by CIA and specializing on falsifications and jugglings served as the primary source for "Chechenpress". At last that the majority from slandered by him people never met him in their life and made nothing bad to him.
Certainly, I understand that the matter is not in these people who are in no way connected with the
Despite of the critical attitude because of some separate aspects to Ramzan Kadyrov I also think that he made incommensurably more for statehood and the real sovereignty of the
At last, somebody does not like an explanatory work which I conduct in the countries of the
Lets return to a "historical meeting" in Nice. Not wishing to give names of respectful people in a scandalous context I wont begin to argue whether such meeting took place or not - let it be left to those who is skilful in clandestine. I will dwell on the fact how professionally and convincingly for the external audience Talkhigov tries to deny the fact of its carrying out. So, newspaper Versiya was the first to mention this event in the issue on
Anyhow, article "Collusion" became a kind of primary source for all publications that followed on the given theme and which were counted in hundreds both in
So, when did the 4th of July appear for the first time? Though it sounds ridiculous but "specified by French and Israeli secret services" date of "meeting in Nice" the 4th of JULY, 1999 was for the first time stated (attention!) in the other article in "Versiya" written by Peter Pryanichnikov. At that unlike Andrey Batumsky Peter Pryanichnikov is not real person but is collective pseudonym of the editorial staff of the newspaper.
I want to remind Talkhigov that newspaper "Versiya" has an image of a scandalous edition with yellow coating. Besides "Versiya" - is a weekly which next issue went on sale exactly on
In connection with it the following question appears why does Takhigov having considered PR-ed July, 4 escapes from timekeeping of the schedule of Shamil Basayev and his doubles "public work" (at the time he had not less than two) in the last week of June, 1999, limiting himself to a tirade about basic impossibility of collusion with the "despicable enemy"? May be because of the fact that having seen to the specifics the author of "Chechenpress" wouldnt receive thanks from Shamil?
Talkhigov avoids also specification of the period of time after "collusion" informing only that Basayev "met people". He doesnt say at this what these people are? For example, whether there was among them Karachai Achemez Gochiyaev? Why not to put the question like this? Where does modesty come from? In fact subsequent acts of Gochiyaev and his Karachai group do not essentially differ from Nord-Ost and Beslan in connection with which a lot of interesting is written in Talkhigovs articles. For example, that Basayevs intentions at the moment when he sent orders to get hostages were the most chivalrous.
In Talkhigovs material there is also no reaction to public performance of Ahmed Zakaev which took place in the previous year together with whom the author of "Chechenpress" recently had taken part in fascinating Internet-discussion on Udugov's opus named "Reflection Of The Mojahed". By the way, it is rather piquantly that "ideologists" seriously continue to consider themselves as mojaheds being far from the Native land in safety and comfort.
But the matter is not in it. Zakaev announced to mass-media that Basayev spent maximum some days a year in the
Anyhow, to the present moment Shamil Basayev has lost practically all. The only thing he didnt lose is hope. The hope that in 20-30 years next generations of Chechens will see in him the hero and the fighter for freedom. Shamil desires it very much. Only whether it will be like this? In fact "assistants" similar to Talkhigov who choose rather delicate topics and provoke discussion around them (whether it is conscious or not?) make their best to hang instead of heroic aura on Basayev a stain of the agent of several services and Chechen priest Gapon at once.
© 1998-2016 FORUM.msk