Кто владеет информацией,
|4 dec 2016|
Baranov Anatoly 30.11.2006
On November, 28th before opening of the summit in a building of National Belarus library the correspondent of "Moscow Komsomol" Natalya Galimova as well as press photographers of "MK" and "Kommersant" Alexander Astafev and Dmitry Azarov were not allowed to enter the building. After that journalists of "the Kremlin pool" accompanying the president of
Here you are a demarche. Freedom-loving Russian journalists showed these, "totalitarian" ones as what meant to be arrogant.
That is it is possible to think that there is such free, fair Russian journalism where there is a professional solidarity and even professional pride. Especially in the newspaper "Moscow Komsomol" and in "the Kremlin pool" in particular.
I know how they can put the journalists from the Kremlin pool doggystyle not from "Messages of the Kremlin Digger". Outside man can seem that especially professional, heaven-god reporters can get into the Kremlin, governmental and other "pools". So, nothings similar. Its something like recognition of a professional inconsistency expressed in more or less comprehensible form.
True reporter goes on hot spots and domestic remote places, searches about dark corners of cities and human souls, digs in gleet and shit of our life its true, real work where something depends on you, sometimes even everything including your own life.
The journalist from a pool doesnt differ from the footman who takes away his maters piss-pot. Meanwhile he is always in heat and well-fed. To wait that the gleams of lights of Its majesty will somehow be reflected in creativity of the footman who is taken away a pot - well its all the same as to ask him about the health of his master. The only thing he can pronounce is: "Master, make piss-piss!" Well and something about a consistence.
Modern domestic journalism which has not managed in time to escape into the Internet degraded almost boundless. But its officious part is Something in general. On a genre its not a composition, even not a summary its mostly a dictation.
And now this public who, in addition, has accustomed itself to be proud of their toady position will make a demarche which is not coordinated twice and thrice with the press-service of Administration of the president. Moreover with 433 references to Yandex?
A new thing here is that in a role of a piss-pot the footman acts.
It is necessary only to understand what for Administrations of the president of
Остается понять, зачем Администрации президента России потребовалось ставить в неудобное положение президента Белоруссии. То есть, понятно, зачем: ты, мол, объединяешься с Украиной против «Газпрома», а мы тебя тогда от Запада по тоталитарной линии не защищаем.
However, an application of the head of the press-service of the president of Belarus Paul Legky who talked nonsence about "insults of the chapter of the
So, it looks not like political theatre but like non-artistical amateur performance.
One of the high-ranking employees of the Belarus state security whom I had an opportunity to consult about the incident, thought that both the head of the press-service and employees from security of Lukashenko were initiated whence from, while Alexander Grigorevich himself wasnt informed in general about the strange activity of his press-service. That is atypical for
If the initiative went somehow from the Russian party, then everythings clear - Putin's press-service simply realized housemaid preparation with "indignation of professionals".
But it looks like Putin was not aware of "active action" of his press-service. That is, not that he was absolutely unaware, but still not so conscious.
And it is a really nasty thing whether a tail wags a dog or in this matter (by the way, that is an opinion my "
© 1998-2016 FORUM.msk